CRITICISMS

CRITICISMS

Sometimes criticisms are leveled at us, which we address openly on this page. One such criticism is that we are “snake oil gurus” selling fake spirituality or so-called miracle cures.
To these childish accusations, made by those who have never studied or verified anything of what we do, we respond directly:

1. There is no scientific evidence. FAKE

Claiming that “there is no scientific evidence” is, in most cases, an ideological stance, not the result of a genuine analysis.

The research exists, and claiming otherwise is simply false.

  • There are years of observations and testimonies gathered through the systematic repetition of our practice protocols.

  • There are countless findings from external practitioners who, even without knowing the details of what we do, observe concrete changes in people who receive our techniques or come into contact with our tools.

  • We also collaborate with doctors, physiatrists, and healthcare professionals who, using assessment tools from their own fields, detect variations and improvements they did not expect to see.

  • We have also conducted double-blind tests, some performed by external laboratory personnel without our influence, on the effects of our tools on water. The data indicates that water modifies some of its properties when subjected to what we call F-Aurea Informational Fields.

Part of this material is made publicly available in the dedicated section: Scientific Researches.

This is work that is still in its initial, non-academic phase, but it is real, documented, honest, and transparent. Anyone with even a basic understanding of how scientific research comes into being knows perfectly well that many disciplines begin as empirical observations and that validation is a progressive process, not a prerequisite.

Saying “there is no research” when it is published and accessible simply means you haven’t bothered to check.

Arguing that it “isn’t scientific” is another oversimplification: the subject of study is indeed not scientific in itself, but the approach to verification and comparison is.

2. Our claims are not verifiable. FAKE

This accusation is refuted by one of the central elements of our approach: direct verification. We do not ask for belief, we do not ask for faith, we do not ask for blind adherence. On the contrary, we ask you to gain experience, and we ourselves teach practices and methods for autonomous etheric measurement and perception.
Our practices, the F-Aurea methods, and related techniques are structured to be learned, trained, and tested directly by the individual, developing over time the ability to perceive and evaluate what occurs.

This implies individual responsibility, not dependence. It is precisely the opposite of manipulative systems, which demand blind trust in the master and discourage any form of autonomous verification or questioning. We are, in fact, the first to invite you to verify, observe, and put things to the test.

The pages dedicated to our Informational Fields advise using them with caution, especially the first few times, because they can have intense effects on some people. This is stated because it actually happens, to make you aware, even though it is information that discourages purchase. If it weren’t verifiable, do you think we would warn you?

3. We don’t know what we are doing; it’s all improvised or AI-generated. FAKE

This is a criticism typical of those who have never delved into the material.
Our work is the result of years of training, study, and field practice, and is based on a deep knowledge of various disciplines, including radionics, radiesthesia, energy-vibrational technique, thetahealing, qigong, pranotherapy, traditional Chinese medicine, meditative practices like vipassana, as well as studies in biology, anatomy, physiology, and neuroscience.
This is not a random collection of information but a system built over time through study, experimentation, observation, and methodological structuring.

Every piece of content we publish, every training path, and every tool we create is the result of years of research, development, and verification.

Anyone who seriously analyzes the available material immediately recognizes that this is not randomly generated, copied, or improvised content, but a coherent and articulated body of work.

Those who do not, simply resort to labeling.

4. We are engaged in illegal or unlicensed activity. FAKE

We operate in full compliance with current European, Czech, and Italian regulations.

Practitioners who train in our main pathway, Ricalibrazione Planetaria ® (Planetary Recalibration Practice), are supported in Italy by professional quality certification no. 141 Sk82, issued by the accredited body FAC Certifica S.r.l., obtained through a process involving training, internship, and final examination. This body operates in compliance with the UNI CEI EN ISO/IEC 17024 standard for the certification of persons.

However, it is crucial to be clear on one point: we do not perform medical diagnoses, we do not prescribe therapies, and we do not replace medicine in any way, nor do we sell miracle cures. We operate in the field of wellness and personal growth, in accordance with the law. To speak of unlicensed practice in this context means either not knowing the regulations or deliberately ignoring them.

5. We should not charge for spiritual services – BELIEF

This is not an objective criticism, but a personal conviction. If you believe that living in misery and poverty is healthy, wholesome, and spiritually elevating, you are free to follow that path, but avoid projecting your illusions onto others. It is not legitimate to demand that others do the same.

We believe that work has value, that time has value, that competence has value. Not recognizing the economic value of others’ work is not spirituality; it is exploitation, which fosters codependent relationships.

The idea that the “spiritual” must be separate from the material plane is a materialistic view and reinforces the same dark forces that would keep the human being in barbarism and ignorance. What we do, although born from passion and inspiration, is also work, and like any other work, it deserves to be compensated.

Dividing spirit and matter often fuels a strong spiritual ego. Those who live in deprivation and give everything for free often consider themselves better or superior to others – but how much envy do they hide within themselves? How much frustration? Frustration naturally accumulates if one is not compensated for the effort and work put in.
Furthermore, another uncomfortable truth is that without charging, it would be impossible to create everything you see and everything we have built.

CONCLUSION

Criticism and skepticism are legitimate and healthy, as they help a human being grow, rising above their current condition.

The problem arises when absolute judgments are made without having verified anything, when prejudice replaces observation and opinion takes the place of experience, when non-existent reviews are invented, when, intentionally or mistakenly, everyone is tarred with the same brush, accusing us of what is others’ responsibility.

Those who truly wish to understand can study the vast amount of material available and gain direct experience. Much of the material you find on our channels and websites is shared for free so that you can experience it.

The difference between believing and knowing is simply this: experiencing it for yourself and understanding it through your own reflection. And this is exactly what our paths encourage you to do.